Skip to content

Where’s Your Employee’s Head?

Whether your traditional HR programs need a simple revitalization based on modern best practices or because you’d like to revolutionize them by applying a social layer, your FIRST step in transforming your existing HR programs is understanding where  an employee’s head is: what they’re thinking, what they need, where they want to go, and who they want to be.

If you follow this blog, you know that I believe the employee lifecycle is the foundation for balancing business needs with the needs of your employees. By integrating them into the employee lifecycle, you turn every day HR transactions into interactions that become tools relevant to how employees live and work, resulting in higher adoption and sustainability. To that end, you will not know where your employees’ heads are unless you break down the employee lifecycle.

In a recent post, Boxer Property identifies its own version of the employee lifecycle and provides some information on each stage. I especially like what they say about onboarding, learning and development:

More compelling is that their infographic illustrates that the current expected tenure for junior roles is 18 months to 3 years. For intermediate roles the average tenure is 3-5 years, and for VP or C-Level executives the average tenure is only 3 years. An average employee may complete this loop more than 15 times in their career. This message is further strengthened by the infographic presented by Rasmussen College which illustrates the current landscape of employee tenure based on the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Infographic Changes in Employee Tenure

Armed with this information, it’s clear that employee needs are different based on where they are within the employee lifecycle and your HR programs must be customized to those needs. For example, engagement and productivity levels are high when an employee is onboarding versus an employee who is separating where levels are extremely low. It’s also important to understand the needs of those employees in between — the ones who you want to maintain a healthy level of engagement — not too much to prevent burnout but enough that they don’t start becoming disengaged.

How you define the employee lifecycle can vary based on your own culture, values and mission. How I would define the employee lifecycle differs slightly from that of Boxer Property. In fact, if you haven’t seen it already, you should take a look at our own infographic: “Putting Social HR in it’s Place: The Employee Lifecycle” which not only defines an employee lifecycle, but also identifies opportunities within the lifecycle to interact with employees socially.

Have you created an employee lifecycle for your organization? If so, tell me! I’d love to see it!!

Social HR and the Employee Lifecycle by The Social Workplace

Tags:

Related Posts

A New Approach to People-Focused Communications

    From April 2021 and September 2021, 19 million employees left their jobs.1 McKinsey Quarterly. “Great attrition or great attraction? The choice is yours.” September 8,… 

    Read More »A New Approach to People-Focused Communications

    Three Steps to Manager-led Employee Engagement

      As a manager, it’s sometimes hard to fathom how much an impact you have over someone else’s happiness and overall job satisfaction. The role of… 

      Read More »Three Steps to Manager-led Employee Engagement

      Understanding the Power of Diverse Personalities at Work

        Communication permeates everything we do and our personalities – our attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors – are a natural driver for how we act and what… 

        Read More »Understanding the Power of Diverse Personalities at Work

        92 thoughts on “Where’s Your Employee’s Head?”

        18. Morgan Norman

          These are wonderful illustrations of how the modern employee and workplace must operate in order to be successful. Setting the right focus, direction, socializing goals, peer-to-peer feedback, and social recognition are all methods through which employees can not only extend their own lifecycle, but also the lifecycle of the organization.

        91. Shaleen Shah

          Would you agree with me that management is to blame for high attrition rate? When technologies are given more value than the people who run it, motivation can go down the drain. Thanks for sharing this infographic and I’m saving it for future reference.

        92. Terri Nakamura

          Interesting and well written. My son is in the first stage of this work cycle. Two years at Google and now at Amazon. Many people his age (26) seem to move from job to job without concern. I remember when it seemed important to establish a track record of stick-to-itiveness by staying with a job for a couple of years. I wonder if that’s no longer the case.

          Thanks for an enlightening post.

        Comments are closed.

        Contact Us